I live in Linty Belly Button, the original home of the American Patriot. They love war and the American soldier almost as much as they love Baby Jesus, college football and large chunks of meat. What they really hate are bleeding-heart liberal feminists who think that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan aren't the best usage of lives and tax dollars. I get a lot of the 'if you don't stand behind our soldiers, you're welcome to stand in front of them' kind of rhetoric, and I'm sure if they listened to me for a minute instead of stamping a label on me they might not hate me so much. Or maybe they would. I'm the wife and daughter of veterans and I have had a first-hand view of exactly how hellish war is on our soldiers. I also happen to believe that the very best way to support our troops is to have them safe and home. To protect them from PTSD, cancer, Gulf War Illness, missing limbs and suicide. To assure their families back home have adequate housing, medical care and support, and while we're at it that they don't have to live in fear either for their own lives or their husband's as the result of the PTSD, depression and stress of living through war. I'm not quite sure how that makes me unpatriotic or not supporting 'our' soldiers. I'm undoubtedly biased but I think it's much better than watching Fox News, waving flags, tying yellow ribbons, yelling "yay troops" and repeatedly playing 'Proud to be an American', which is, as far as I can see, how the average 'troop-supporting patriot' shows their patriotism and encourages the troops.
Right now, the American military system is broken. Congressmen are raking in six-figure salaries while the average service-member or veteran is living below poverty level. If s/he has a family, they likely qualify for WIC and food stamps, and often have to choose whether they can afford the medical co-pay for a spouse or child to receive needed care. Veterans and their families are going without needed medical equipment, prescriptions and care because of the limitations of the VA system and lack of money. Base housing is often unsafe and limited but at least the monthly bills are lower than living off-base. For disabled veterans, getting adaptations to their homes or cars is near impossible as the VA system is swamped with claims and service organisations such as Disabled American Veterans and Veterans of Foreign Wars do very little to actually help veterans receive their earned benefits. Thankfully a military base is a self-contained community with shopping, medical and even fast food joints a mere brisk walk away. However, the commissary and BX system, which are supposed to provide on-site grocery and housing goods for military members and their families are filled with expensive, name-brand goods and the commissary has a surcharge that often makes shopping there impractical for the lower ranks and retirees. Most commissaries are filled with processed foods and very little to accommodate those wishing to eat organic whole foods, nor do many have selections for those suffering celiac, lactose intolerance or dietary allergies. This all comes from first-hand experience, I've lived this.
It's unfathomable for me to believe that it is being unpatriotic to want children to grow up physically and emotionally healthy, without having to know the heartbreak of losing a parent in war or to the effects of war. I also know this from first-hand experience. The fact is: children are the greatest losers whenever there is war. I grew up without my father. It is heartless to say he could have been replaced. It wasn't possible. My step-mother got on perfectly fine with her life after my father's death, within months she was dating again and not much after a year she moved in with another man. She didn't want to marry him, you see, because that would have meant she would no longer be eligible for my father's military benefits and she didn't want to lose that. Many widows and widowers choose this option to assure they don't lose the benefits, the children, meanwhile, have to live with the fact that their parent will never return. When the surviving parent lives with another partner, there often is not the same stability or love that the deceased parent provided. So it provides a safety net for the parent while it allows the child to slip through and suffer. The children truly are the biggest losers in this scenario.
When children orphaned by war reach 18, they no longer receive monetary compensation for their parent's death. If they are able to go to university, there are educational benefits that barely cover tuition at the community college level. The surviving spouse, however, continues to receive monthly income courtesy the goverment. The child no longer receives medical benefits under his parent's name, although the surviving spouse does. This apparently comes from the thought process that the child is now an adult and should be able to provide these things for himself, while the surviving spouse, whether s/he has chosen another partner, should still be provided for. I believe it is a sick, broken system that heaps even more dysfunction and misery on already suffering kids. Children whose parents serve in the military and who lose their parents in war certainly suffer financially. But they suffer so much more emotionally. There is no support from the military or government to make sure these children receive psychological help, to be there for father-daughter teas/dances, to give the bride away on her wedding day, to teach teen to drive. Kids are left to make do the best they can, often without the support even of their remaining parent or parent figure. These are deep wounds and they affect all of society.
My father taught me to speak French, Turkish, Japanese and a few words of German. He taught me to love ethnic foods. He taught me to open my heart to friends of every colour, race, religion and philosophy. He was not ashamed to have tea parties with me, to cheer at my ballet recitals or hug my teddy bear when it got a 'boo boo'. He wasn't ashamed to bring my brother and I along with him when he received a commendation for bravery in battle. He was the kind of guy who was so loved and respected by his co-workers that they built sand castles at the beach with my brother and treated me like a fairy princess. The kind of man that other soldiers wanted to serve with because (so they said) they knew they'd make it home alive if they were with him. Two fellows did indeed come home because my father was willing to risk his own life to save them from enemy fire. That is the person that my brother and I, and the world, lost because of war.
The man my step-mother lived with assumed no responsibility for my medical bills, he didn't set up a college trust for me, he didn't even give me an allowance. He showed no kindness to me, nor gave me support of any kind. He did not fill, in any way, a father role for me. He did not provide any help or guidance for my future. I have no father, he was taken from me. He was not, could not ever be replaced and I bear the scars to this day of the loss. Yes, I have achieved a life of my own, I have gone on to form a happy, loving family and I'm a 'functioning member of society'. But given the choice, I would rather have had my father, and for the other orphans of war to have their fathers too, than to have them wasted in a conflict that has no real bearing on the defence of the country. If that makes me unpatriotic, if that makes me a bleeding-heart liberal, if that makes me unsupportive to 'our' troops, I will accept that label any day over that of "patriot" and their superstitious sacrificing of soldiers to the Gods of War in hopes that we are all "safe" from some hypothetical evil.